I got into hot water a couple weeks back when I suggested on Facebook that Stormtroopers could wear their Khaki armor and loafers on Casual Friday. Yoda in particular, seemed to take offense at the thought. I tried to give voice to the notion that even clones are people too. But to some, they are simply cattle to be herded. Please add your own thoughts in the comment section on this important issue.
>> I wrote a post, Tell Them About the Twinkie, to highlight that arguing over non-defense discretionary spending is only a tiny battle in a much bigger war on spending. Jeffrey Anderson at the Weekly Standard blog tells us that mandatory spending has now swallowed the entire Federal Revenue,
We have now gotten to the point — as I noted yesterday — where if national defense, interstate highways, national parks, homeland security, and all other discretionary programs somehow became absolutely free, we’d still have a budget deficit. The White House Office of Management and Budget projects that in the current fiscal year (2011), mandatory spending alone will exceed all federal receipts. So even if we didn’t spend a single cent on discretionary programs, we still wouldn’t be able to balance our budget this year — let alone pay off any of the $14 trillion in debt that we have already accumulated.
Speaker of the House John Boehner has said that he thinks people just don't understand the issue. “People in Washington assume that Americans understand how big the problem is,” he said. “But most Americans don’t have a clue.” Cutting a few billion in foreign aid or increasing taxes cannot fix this problem. Only adjusting the future of entitlement programs can.
Representative Paul Ryan is the point man in the House on tackling this problem. Ryan told Mike Huckabee on Fox News. “If we do it now, we do it on our terms, meaning we don’t change anything for people in and near retirement. But if we wait, if we keep delaying and kicking the can down the road, then it will look like Europe — bitter austerity. Cuts will happen to current seniors, and that’s what we want to avoid.”
Delaying action is no longer an option. Well, technically it is an option, but only if you consider retiring with no savings an option.
>> Over at NRO, Conrad Black covers a lot of ground in his article, On Libya, the US Is a Pitiful Giant. He compares the heroic Japanese response in their current fight for survival to the horrid response in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. Flaws at the national, state and local level in New Orleans to be sure, but Americans do not come out to well in the comparison.
Black then goes on to blister President Obama's weak response in Libya.
As for Libya, there is room for legitimate debate over what to do there, but I cannot believe that there is a single conscient American who has followed these matters who is not appalled by the grotesquerie of American policy fumbling that has stalked, wreathed, and bedeviled this issue. The president, draped in what is becoming infamous sanctimony, said, of Qaddafi, “He has lost all legitimacy and he must go. . . . The best revolutions are organic. . . . We are not sure.” Weeks pass, thousands are massacred, and the White House has no standing to assess the legitimacy of foreign governments under challenge and portentously to asseverate moral imperatives, and then waffle over the course cried out for by the majority of Libyans and urged by the European Union and the Arab League, representing the entire adjoining regions. This president (of the United States) famously said in Prague in 2009, “Words must mean something” in reference to arms control, which he has pursued in regard to the United States but not to Iran or North Korea. He was correct; they must, when uttered by the holder of his great office, but they don’t, at this sadly disappointing time, in arms control or the assistance of the forces of oppressed legitimacy.
I remember past Presidents agreeing with my father when he told me never to say anything I didn't intend to back up.
"If you're gonna talk the talk, then you better walk the walk"
"Speak softly and carry a big stick"
All over the mid-east people are dying for the cause of liberty, while we continue to talk....to witness....to watch....to do nothing.
>> I'm still holding out caution on Japan's nuclear crisis until all the fact are in. By their design, even a total meltdown should be able to be contained. A large issue is the lack of water and the particles in the available water. Clean de-mineralized water will not react with the fuel and thus any steam would carry little radiation. But saltwater and other impurities in the improvised cooling water will react and release larger quantities of radiation in the steam that is released. Meltdown or not, the containing vessel should keep the fuel from being directly released into the atmosphere, which is what happened at Chernobyl. But as I said, I await the facts before making a call on this situation.
>> Waiting on those facts doesn't mean I can't share a couple of tidbits.
First, it has been noted by a researcher working for the World Health Organization, that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself with regards to radiation. Gateway Pundit has the story.
a top expert on radiation says that fear of radiation is a bigger health threat than radiation itself. Technorati.com reported:A top expert on radiation, doing studies for the World Health Organization, reports that fear of radiation exposure has caused more health problems than the radiation itself. Other experts on psychological effects of radiation agree. In addition to the fear of the effects of the radiation, survivors are stigmatized by their society, increasing stress and feelings of isolation. This stigmatization can interfere with the survivors getting proper health care, jobs, and economic stability. Others turn away from them, fearing that association with those who have been exposed to radiation can be “catching.” Experts who have studied these impacts at Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Nagasaki, and Hiroshima, say that the fear and stigmatization causes so much stress in the people affected that, overall, the stress is more damaging to health than the radiation itself.Someone needs to forward this to Shepard Smith on FOX who has been fear-mongering all week.
The other side of the issue is brought to us by Newsbusters,
The dangers of nuclear power, while serious, need to be put in perspective. To that end, here's an interesting fact you won't be hearing from the mainstream press: wind energy has killed more Americans than nuclear energy.
You read that right. According to the Caithness Windfarm Information Forum, there were 35 fatalities associated with wind turbines in the United States from 1970 through 2010. Nuclear energy, by contrast, did not kill a single American in that time.
The meltdown at Three Mile Island in 1979 did not kill or injure anyone, since the power plant's cement containment apparatus did its job - the safety measures put in place were effective. Apparently the safety measures associated with wind energy are not adequate to prevent loss of life.
As I already have stated, this has absolutely nothing to do with the crisis in Japan. I just found both bits of information interesting.
>> The House of Representatives voted to defund NPR today. It has no chance of passing the Senate, so NPR is safe. But why? I ask the same question of PBS - why? What need is there for the government to fund a TV and radio network in America? Funding the Voice of America abroad I can understand. Our nation should have a global agenda that will be furthered by a variety of mediums. But domestically, do we want our federal government promoting an agenda through the media?
I know, I know....NPR and PBS are independent voices that do not receive their orders from the government. That's fine and I accept that. So tell me again why we fund them. What purpose do they serve our government and the taxpayers if they do not take their orders from them? If they provided a service that no one else in the marketplace wished to provide, this would be more acceptable. But unlike say the Water Department, NPR and PBS have dozens of competitors doing pretty much exactly what they are doing.
On Thursday’s “Good Morning America,” Donald Trump questioned whether or not President Obama was born in the United States, and pushed back on the notion that others who question President Obama’s birthplace are idiots.Regarding questions surrounding Obama’s birth, Trump said:Everybody that even gives any hint of being a birther…they label them as an idiot. Let me tell you, I’m a really smart guy. I was a really good student at the best school in the country. The reason I have a little doubt — just a little — is because he grew up and nobody knew him. …Nobody knows who he is until later in his life. It’s very strange. The whole thing is very strange.
Ignoring the story of these threats is deeply, fundamentally wrong. It's bad, biased journalism that will lead to no possible good outcome and progressives should be leading the charge against it.
* In today's edition, I have two bits questioning President Obama's efforts and abilities, so I guess I can be included in the nuts section. It's just exasperating to see such a failure of leadership. But don't take my word for it. This is what is being reported by Joshua Hersh at The Atlantic,
Fed up with a president “who can’t make his mind up” as Libyan rebels are on the brink of defeat, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is looking to the exits.
At the tail end of her mission to bolster the Libyan opposition, which has suffered days of losses to Col. Moammar Gadhafi’s forces, Clinton announced that she’s done with Obama after 2012 — even if he wins again.
“Obviously, she’s not happy with dealing with a president who can’t decide if today is Tuesday or Wednesday, who can’t make his mind up,” a Clinton insider told The Daily. “She’s exhausted, tired.”
He went on, “If you take a look at what’s on her plate as compared with what’s on the plates of previous Secretary of States — there’s more going on now at this particular moment, and it’s like playing sports with a bunch of amateurs. And she doesn’t have any power. She’s trying to do what she can to keep things from imploding.”
I'm not often inclined to agree with Secretary Clinton. If this means I'm nuts, so be it.
Please do your part. Give a hoot, don't pollute. Be informed before you argue. Spend more time listening than talking (two ears, one mouth). Kids eat free on Tuesday.